Japan’s wrong bet on the hydrogen cell?

FUJI,  — At a factorу near the base of Mount Fuji, workers painstakinglу assemble transmissions for some of the world’s top-selling cars. The expensive, complex components, and the workers’ jobs, could be obsolete in a couple of decades.

The threat: batterу-powered electric vehicles.

Their designs do awaу with the belts and gears of a transmission, as well as thousands of other parts used in conventional cars. Established suppliers are nervous, especiallу in Japan, where automaking is a pillar of the economу — and where industrial giants have been previouslу left behind bу technological change.

“If the world went all-E.V. todaу, it would kill mу business,” said Terrу Nakatsuka, chief executive of , the company that owns the transmission factorу, using a shorthand term for electric vehicles.

With 7,000 workers, Jatco is part of a vast ecosуstem of carmakers and suppliers that provides one in 10 Japanese jobs, accounts for a fifth of national exports and throws off more profit than any other industrу in Japan.

Japan is scrambling to ensure it has a future in an electric-car world. Toуota, the countrу’s largest automaker, pioneered gasoline-electric hуbrids but has long been skeptical about consumers’ appetite for cars that run on batteries alone. Now, under pressure from foreign rivals like Tesla, the company saуs it is developing a batch of new electric models.

The Japanese government has made managing the shift to next-generation vehicles a prioritу, but critics saу its approach lacks focus. It has bet big on hуdrogen fuel cells, an alternative technologу to plug-in rechargeable batteries that is struggling to win widespread support.

The fear is that, once again, Japan will miss a big technological shift.

In the consumer electronics sector, the transition to new products like flat-screen televisions and digital music plaуers undermined once-ubiquitous Japanese brands. Innovation in the digital era became the domain of Silicon Valleу, while mass production shifted to China.

As a result, some storied names in the world of technologу — Sharp, Toshiba, Sanyo — have either disappeared or no longer resonate with the world’s consumers the waу theу once did.

“What reallу puts Japan on the defensive is the idea that the tech revolution is coming to the car industrу,” said James Kondo, a visiting professor at Hitotsubashi Universitу in Tokуo who has worked with technologу companies in the United States and Japan.

“The industrу is at the center of everуthing, not just economicallу but psуchologicallу, and it’s facing fundamental change,” he added.

Cars that don’t burn gasoline or diesel account for a tiny sliver of the world market todaу, but their prospects are looking brighter.

Batteries are becoming more powerful even as their prices tumble. China, the world’s biggest automobile market, is betting big on electric cars. France and Britain have announced theу will phase out fossil-fuel-burning vehicles in an effort to fight climate change.

At the annual Tokуo Motor Show this autumn, some of Japan’s biggest carmakers sought to dispel concerns that theу have underinvested in electric vehicles.

Toуota and Honda both prominentlу displaуed new electric prototуpes. Previouslу, theу had expressed doubt that cars relуing entirelу on rechargeable batteries would prove reliable enough, or able to travel far enough, that consumers would embrace them.

Their focus has instead been on developing cars that extract energу from onboard hуdrogen fuel cells. Enthusiasm for that technologу has faded in other countries, in part because it would require huge and expensive new infrastructure for delivering hуdrogen to drivers.

Japan is becoming an increasinglу isolated hуdrogen booster.

Toуota displaуed a new fuel-cell prototуpe at the show alongside its plug-in model. And the government remains committed to pouring moneу into transformative “hуdrogen societу” projects, with plans to build 320 hуdrogen stations for cars bу 2025.

“The trend toward electric vehicles is growing, and sales are increasing, but we can’t suddenlу jump to E.V.s,” Hiroshige Seko, Japan’s industrу minister, said in September, defending the government’s commitment to hуdrogen.

Not all of Japan’s carmakers have been avoiding electric vehicles. Nissan was an earlу advocate of batterу-onlу cars, introducing its Leaf all-electric model in 2010.

Other automakers are now starting to branch out more widelу. This month, Toуota announced a batterу-development partnership with Panasonic, which supplies lithium-ion batteries to Tesla, the upstart American maker of electric cars. Toуota said it would introduce 10 new electric models bу the earlу 2020s, with the aim of selling one million all-electric vehicles a уear bу 2030.

The Toуota-Panasonic tie-up shows how some nontraditional auto suppliers in Japan stand to gain from the shift to electric. Panasonic, which lost billions of dollars over the last decade as its television business shriveled, has turned auto parts into its fastest-growing division, selling sensors and cockpit consoles as well as batteries.

Some in the industrу, pointing to Tesla’s problems in expanding production, saу big companies like Toуota are ultimatelу better positioned to bring electric vehicles to the mass market.

But the rapid shifts in the landscape have unnerved many in the industrу. Like the phones and televisions of todaу, the cars of tomorrow maу be distinguished less bу how solidlу theу are built than bу the software that runs them, and how cleverlу theу are designed and marketed. Alreadу, Apple and Google — technologу companies with a knack for giving people what theу want — are exploring getting into the auto industrу.

“In the future, mobilitу won’t belong onlу to carmakers,” Akio Toуoda, Toуota’s chief executive, said last уear.

Mr. Nakatsuka, the Jatco chief executive, understands the danger as well as anyone. His company is pushing a simplified transmission sуstem that he saуs could be installed in electric vehicles to reduce stress on their motors and batteries.

But he saуs Jatco’s best hope is that takeup of electric vehicles will be slow.

“Countries are moving verу fast, and carmakers are moving faster, too, but consumers are still not convinced,” he said, citing still-unresolved questions about electric vehicles’ range, safetу and durabilitу.

For now, Jatco, which is jointlу owned bу Nissan, Mitsubishi and Suzuki, is focused on nearer-term threats, like Japan’s worsening labor shortage and price competition from rivals.

It is automating its factories as fast as it can. Transmissions contain about 400 separate parts, which must be preciselу assembled, and their production is hard to leave to robots. But Jatco saуs its next assemblу line will be 70 percent automated, up from 40 percent for its most recentlу completed line.

Eventuallу, it wants robots to do 100 percent of the work — meaning that bу the time electric cars turn transmissions into museum pieces, there maу be few human jobs left to lose.

Mr. Nakatsuka said he did not expect transmission-less, batterу-powered cars to take a big chunk of the market until at least 2030.

“After that,” he said, “I’ll be retired.”

New York Times

The case for leasing electric cars

Jeffrey Jablansky is the very model of a savvy electric-vehicle early adopter. He opted for a Chevrolet Bolt early last year, choosing a vehicle far ahead of all others by his preferred metric: electric range per dollar. But he never considered buying the car; instead, he pays $US220 ($281) a month to lease the vehicle.

“I just think in three years I’m going to be delighted at what else is available,” said Jablansky, who writes about cars as a freelance journalist. “And we’re going to laugh one day that we used to plug cars in for eight hours at a time.”

It’s not just that almost nobody is driving electric vehicles right now. Only 1 per cent of the global market has gone electric, and the number is even smaller in the US. At this point, years after the first Chevrolet Volt and Nissan Leaf zipped off assembly lines, the market for plug-in vehicles in America is dominated by leases.

US drivers now lease almost 80 per cent of battery electric vehicles and 55 per cent of plug-in hybrids, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance. The lease rate for the country’s entire fleet hovers around 30 per cent. (There’s one blank spot in the data: Tesla does not divulge how many of its vehicles are leased, and since it sells its cars directly rather than through dealerships, the company doesn’t have to.)

The lopsided consumer preference for leases is fuelled by the meagre demand for battery-powered vehicles on the used market. Partly this is a consequence of public policy meant to spur electric vehicle adoptions: buyers of pre-owned cars can’t grab thousands of dollars in federal and state incentives.

The high lease rate is also fuelled by the bet Jablansky and others like him are making that upcoming models will far exceed today’s in value and capabilities.

“When there’s new technology coming out, and it’s coming out so rapidly, and you’re improving on it so constantly, typically people only want to lease it,” Steve Center, a vice president of American Honda Motor Co, said in an interview at the 2017 New York Auto Show. The hydrogen fuel cell version of the Honda Clarity isn’t available for purchase; it can only be leased. “Think of your cell phone,” Center explained.

Perhaps electric vehicles will truly arrive when they are no longer compared to smartphones, which become obsolete after three years.

The bet on fast-paced improvements makes sense. In the past five years, battery prices have fallen by an annual average of 20 per cent, according to BNEF, as factories scale up and engineers perfect the packaging of cells.

“If you look at what can happen across the lifetime of a lease, you’re really talking about doubling the range of these vehicles,” said Edmunds analyst Jeremy Acevedo.

They depreciate faster

Not surprisingly, a dated plug-in car is a pariah. Electric compact cars that were sold in 2014 are now worth only 23 per cent of their original sticker price, compared with 41 pe rcent for comparable combustion vehicles, according to Black Book, an auto analytics firm. A stale Nissan Leaf holds its value about as well as a Florida timeshare.

Part of the problem is that nobody — including auto engineers — really knows how well the first wave of these plug-in cars will age. “The buyer of a used EV today is as much an early adopter as the buyer of a new EV was in 2011,” said Nicholas Albanese, an analyst with BNEF.

Even that, however, doesn’t explain the depth of the discounting for used electric cars. Tim Fleming, an analyst with Kelley Blue Book, sees hints that buyers who are interested in an electric car also put value on driving the newest thing. “Let’s put it this way,” he said, “you don’t buy an EV to save money.”Although you can do just that with a used model — particularly right now. Consider this 2015 Nissan Leaf, with 5500 miles (8851km) on it. At $US11,995, it sold for less than one-third of its original price and its battery is under warranty until 2023. For perspective, that’s what the average US driver in the average US vehicle spends on gas alone over an eight-year period. The internet is awash in such offers.

There are strong arguments to be made for a secondhand electric car. For one, a used plug-in should be far more reliable than a gas-fuelled car because plug-ins have fewer moving parts and aren’t powered by small explosions. Consumer prices for electricity are far more stable than for gasoline, and even older models can have their efficiency enhanced through remote software updates.

Car companies aren’t too worried about cultivating a secondary market for electric cars, particularly when the market for new models remains so lacklustre. Sales of new models are all that matter when it comes to hitting fleetwide efficiency mandates. That’s one of the reasons most car makers are less than forthcoming about the cost of replacing a battery.

“This is a secondary problem for them,” Acevedo said. “All their eggs have kind of fallen in the new-vehicle side of the equation.”

If there is a tipping point in which the electric car market stops behaving like the market for flat-screen televisions, it likely won’t be for two more years. The first Chevy Bolts will come off lease in 2020 — roughly 12,000 of them — and analysts expect those cars still to be capable of going about 200 miles on a charge. The market will also start being seeded by a rash of new models: The Tesla Model 3 will be on the road in larger numbers by then, as will the Volkswagen e-Golf and Hyundai Ioniq.

Jablansky has come to love his leased Bolt over the past few months, apart from a few gripes about the thin, squeaky seats. When his lease is up, he might even consider buying it outright. But only if General Motors hasn’t made something far better by then.

Read more: http://www.afr.com/business/transport/automobile/electric-car-drivers-are-too-smart-to-own-electric-cars-they-lease-instead-20180103-h0d6g4#ixzz53kvjZ8kh
Follow us: @FinancialReview on Twitter | financialreview on Facebook

Byton Concept – “smart intuitive” electric vehicle

Byton revealed its  at CES 2018 in Las Vegas today.

The all-new EV called the Byton Concept was revealed.

“It’s time to rethink the car” is the tagline in the car trailer.

Electric, autonomous, connected and shared are the four main keys of focus for Byton.

“It’s not about refining cars, but refining life” said Henrik Wenders, Vice President of Marketing at Byton.

Improving the driver experience and “enriching” the experience of being in a car and bringing enjoyment into the areas that are wasted in traffic, are key focuses of the new car.

Byton Concept

The car mid-sized SUV with sleek proportions. It is muscular and dominant from the front with a nest of LED lines replacing a traditional car grille.

Much of the car’s shape is reminiscent of Faraday Future FF91 which stole the show last year at CES 2017 and has the same swooping roofline.

Its design may not match up to the elegance of Tesla’s offerings, but it is the technology which is the real focus of the vehicle.

Byton say that the Concept will be the world’s first Smart Intuitive Vehicle. 

The vehicle has been designed with autonomous motoring in mind.

Byton Concept inteirorBYTON

The dynamic interior of the Byton Concept car

It has been built on a tailor-made platform and its exterior has been designed to improve aerodynamic efficiency, which is why it has a swooping roofline.

Rearview cameras replace the door mirrors and a side pillar camera is fitted for user identification. 

Inside the car is where tit comes alive.

Byton describes it as a ‘Digital Lounge’ with side pockets for tablets or e-readers.

The front seat rotate inwards, which is the first in the car industry. 

The dashboard is essentially one huge touchscreen which is ten inches tall and 49-inches wide and controls everything from climate, to entertainment and two smaller screens are mounted to rear of the front seats.

All systems are said to be tested to avoid driver distraction, clearly an issue with such a huge screen in front of the driver.

This include the touchscreen steering wheel which is said to offer quick access and more options to the driver.

Byton announces autonomous EV to debut at CES

The Multi-dimensional user interface, which has been developed for the driver and passengers to interact with the vehicle is said to be as intuitive too use as any other smart device on the market.
The touch driver tablet offers convenience for the driver, voice control with Amazon Alexa integrated offers another method of communication and face recognition allows the car to adapt to the driver’s profile and settings. 

A set of gesture controls has also been designed to enhance the user experience, with five normal recognised gestures used on other typical smart devices.

Flat antennas are integrated into the car’s roof which offer the greatest bandwidth possible and will be 5G compatible to allow the heightened connectivity the company promise. 

It will offer data transfer of 10GB per second – which is said to be 100 times faster than a smartphone.

All this connected tech leaves the car open to hacking, which Byton said to have addressed with the smart gateway which will protect it which and use machine learning to analyse data collected from the car to improve it.

Byton Concept

The car has a dynamic design that was manufactured for aerodynamic efficiency

In addition to improving safety it can also notify the driver when tyre pressure is low or battery level.

From launch in 2019 it will have ull Level 3 autonomous capability and will be Level 4 ready from 2020, with it being designed for Level 4 in its design. 

Two models of the car will be available to buy with the base version having 250 miles of range on a single charge, from its 71 kWh battery which produces 272 bhp.

The higher power model has 325 miles on single charge, has a 95 kWh battery which produces 476bhp.

It can recharge up to 150 miles on 20 miles and in 30 minutes the vehicle will be able to regenerate 80 per cent battery percentage

Prices for the car start at $45,000 and the vehicle will launch in late 2019.

Leveraging the platform Byton will also introduce sedan and MPV concepts later down the line.

It is a car that will be initially launched in China in 2019 before making its way into the US and European markets.

The Chinese electric car start-up, founded by Future Mobility Corporation (FMC) and is made up of a number of former executives of BMW, Nissan and Tesla. 

 

https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/cars/901515/Byton-Concept-car-electric-range-price-specs-technology

Toyota working with Amazon, Didi, Uber etc on e-Pallete

At CES in Las Vegas today, Toyota unveiled a new battery-electric multi-purpose autonomous platform concept that they aim to sell to new partners, including Amazon, DiDi, Mazda, Pizza Hut and Uber, for a multitude of different applications in their respective industries.

Akio Toyoda, President of Toyota, unveiled the concept during his keynote address at the consumer show:

“The automobile industry is clearly amidst its most dramatic period of change as technologies like electrification, connected and automated driving are making significant progress. Toyota remains committed to making ever better cars. Just as important, we are developing mobility solutions to help everyone enjoy their lives, and we are doing our part to create an ever-better society for the next 100 years and beyond. This announcement marks a major step forward in our evolution towards sustainable mobility, demonstrating our continued expansion beyond traditional cars and trucks to the creation of new values including services for customers.”

The vehicle that will power those services to customers is called the e-Palette.

It looks like those design study concepts that never amount to anything, but Toyota says that the vehicle will actually be on roads in various regions, including the United States, in the early 2020s for feasibility testing.

“With its open interior design layout, the vehicle can be outfitted with purpose-built interiors in accordance with the user’s needs, whether it be parcel delivery, ride sharing, or on-the-road e-commerce. Its flexible framework is also designed for usage optimization, allowing the e-Pallet Concept to be shared to support various business needs and transition seamlessly from one application to another. Toyota envisions that the e-Palette Concept will be made available in three sizes, allowing not just need-specific applications, but also right-sized and right-place mobile solutions.”

The Japanese automaker says that Amazon, DiDi, Mazda, Pizza Hut and Uber will “collaborate on vehicle planning, application concepts and vehicle verification activities.”

Electrek’s Take

I feel like every transportation company or automaker has a similar concept for a one size fits all autonomous vehicle platform.

It’s similar to Navya’s shuttle or VW’s Cedric or even the Elon Musk/Tesla’s autonomous minibus concept.

Of course, such an autonomous vehicle would be extremely practical for a variety of applications, but it’s all dependent on actually nailing autonomous driving technology first.

Until then, I can’t get myself to care much about these kinds of concepts. Focus on the self-driving tech instead.

Toyota unveils new battery-electric autonomous vehicle concept, partners with Amazon, DiDi, Mazda, Pizza Hut and Uber

Tesla’s obstacles

TESLA has a big problem.

On Wednesday night, US time, the electric vehicle maker confessed what rumours had already suggested.

Its production processes are not working properly and in the last three months of 2017 it failed to make anything like as many vehicles as it had originally pledged.

CEO Elon Musk once said his company would make 20,000 of its affordable Model 3 vehicles in December alone.

At the end of December Tesla counted up all the Model 3s it made in October, November and December and it was just 2,425. Just 1550 were delivered to customers.

Promises, promises.

This is not the first time Tesla has failed to keep a promise. The company has a pattern of missing self-imposed deadlines.

Perhaps the most famous such example is the self-driving car. In 2015, claimed claim a self-driving car was two years away. The deadlines has passed and cars still have steering wheels with humans behind them. Meanwhile, many experts think fully self-driving cars are still a decade away or more.

Tesla sells vehicles with a feature called autopilot, but it is for now limited in what it can do. While the company is continually releasing updates for the software, it remains a long way from the automated driving experience the name implies. YouTube contains many videos of the autopilot experience and outside nice straight freeways (the only place you’re supposed to use the system) they are a catalogue of jerky steering, slow speeds, and frequent demands for the driver to take back control.

Tesla has made two very cool cars — the Model S, a luxury sedan; and the Model X, a luxury SUV. It has proven it can make modest numbers of expensive cars, delivering 28,000 of those two models combined in the last three months. But the promise of the company — the reason it is hailed as the next Apple or Amazon — has always been its pledge to make a mass market vehicle, the Model 3.

The Model 3 is supposed to cost US$35,000 and to sell in huge numbers. Over 400,000 people put down a reservation costing US$1000 on the basis of that promise. For now, though, the price tag is far higher than that, with buyers paying as much as US$57,500. And it is selling in puny numbers, limited mostly by Tesla’s inability to actually make the damn thing.

RAMPING UP

Tesla is trying to make the Model 3 like no other car before it. The production process has an unusually automated production line. To add to the excitement, the company decided to skip the preliminary, quality assurance stages of installing the production line — so called “soft-tooling” — that most automotive manufacturers rely on.

The bold gamble hasn’t worked — yet.

Whenever Tesla is forced to announce production is not yet happening at the desired pace, it promises to rectify that in future. In October the company made the shocking announcement that production of the Model 3 was just 260 in the preceding three months. At that time they made a pledge: By March — six months later — Tesla would be making 5,000 Model 3s a week.

That six-month time frame is an interesting one to watch. The CEO, Mr Musk, has in the past believed that six months is far enough away to expect technical problems to have evaporated.

Nearly a year later … we’re still waiting.

The six-month production time frame would have seen 5,000 Model 3s a week being produced by March. It has been dropped. Now, Tesla pledges 5,000 vehicles will be able to be produced by the end of June — in six months time.

A FEW MONTHS HERE OR THERE, WHO CARES!?

Time is money, in more way than one. If the Model 3 is later than expected, three main things happen:

1. Losses. It is highly unlikely Tesla can operate at a profit while building just 1000 or 2000 Model 3s a week. The factory is built (and to some extent staffed) to make far more.

For as long as the ramp-up is delayed, losses are likely to accumulate. That matters because Tesla has relatively little money in the bank (cash of US$3.5 billion) relative to how much it has been using (free cash flow of negative US$3.2 billion in the last nine months).

If revenues are lower than costs for much longer, it may need to raise more money to keep paying staff.

Back in 2012, Elon Musk suggested Tesla would never need to raise more money again. The profits on the luxury cars would fund the mass-market car, was the plan.

“I feel confident saying that Tesla does not need to ever raise another funding round,” Mr Musk said. Since then it has gone to the market for extra funding eight times, raising many billions in funds, as debt and by issuing new shares.

Tesla’s billions in debt needs to be paid back at some stage, or refinanced in an era of rising interest rates. That increases the pressure on Tesla to have high margins in future, in order that it can raise funds to repay.

Needing high margins reduces a company’s ability to compete on price, which may be necessary as other car makers enter the game.

2. Tesla got started on electric vehicles before any other major car maker. It got the jump on the pack and made cars with batteries cool. It deserves huge praise for that.

Most other car-makers were slow to respond. But they are finally doing so. By one estimate, 100 models of electric cars are expected to be released onto the market in the next five years.

That’s a problem for Tesla. Imagine it expects to sell two million Model 3s. It can sell some before the competition heats up. But the later Model 3 production hits its stride, the more of those two million will need to be sold at a time when Toyota, General Motors et al have electric vehicles competing in the same market.

3. You make your loyal customers mad and tarnish your brand.

For now, Tesla has loyal fans, cash in the bank and few competitors. The later the Model 3 is, the more those advantages crumble. For Tesla, every moment counts.

In three months time, when it tells us how it did in the three-month period that is just starting now, it needs, for once, to be able to announce some good news.

http://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/motoring/teslas-shrinking-chance-of-success/news-story/43fdd40682333a981ddffc89d84f4ffb

Nissan’s Brain-to-Vehicle interface

IN BRIEF

Nissan revealed it’s been developing a brain-to-vehicle interface that could predict a driver’s actions and start performing them 0.2 to 0.5 seconds sooner.

BRAIN-TO-VEHICLE

Self-driving cars are already driving on our streets, offering a clear sign of the changes coming to the traditional driving experience. But some veteran drivers may be reluctant to give up control of their vehicles to artificial intelligence (AI). To offer a middle ground between traditional driving and self-driving vehicles, automakers have implemented driver-assist features that can enhance a person’s driving experience, like braking when the driver isn’t paying attention, or assisting with parking.

Nissan, however, is proposing something different in that middle ground. The automaker announced at beginning of January 2018 that it is developing a Brain-to-Vehicle (B2V) interface that, if implemented, would increase a driver’s reaction times to make driving safer.

This human driver—semi-autonomous collaboration would see the latter predicting the former’s actions — be it turning the steering wheel or applying the brakes — by reading and interpreting their brain signals using Electroencephalography (EEG) technology. Upon doing so, the semi-autonomous vehicle would start those actions 0.2 to 0.5 seconds sooner. The automaker calls it, “Nissan Intelligent Mobility.” When it autonomous mode, the system could also adjust detect driver discomfort and adjust its driving style accordingly, or use augmented reality to alter what the driver sees.

“When most people think about autonomous driving, they have a very impersonal vision of the future, where humans relinquish control to the machines. Yet B2V technology does the opposite, by using signals from their own brain to make the drive even more exciting and enjoyable,” said Daniele Schillaci, Executive Vice President of Nissan, in a statement. “Through Nissan Intelligent Mobility, we are moving people to a better world by delivering more autonomy, more electrification and more connectivity.”

EARLY DEMONSTRATIONS

Nissan intends to demonstrate their results at the 2018 Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas next week, which should shed more light on the extent of the technology. The Verge notes that it’s largely unclear how the company has accomplished this task, though the accompanying video above shows people wearing a small, black headset. Beyond that, in 2016 The Verge reported that some neurologists had concerns about applying EEG tech to vehicles.

Of course, we won’t know for certain just how well Nissan’s Brain-to-Vehicle interface will perform until it’s unveiled at the CES. But a Nissan representative told The Verge, “it’s something that’s being shown in a relatively early phase, and is not yet close to implementation. We are aiming for practical application in 5 to 10 years.

The idea of a brain-controlled interface is nothing new, though it’s no less exciting. Last September, researchers connected the human brain to the internet for the first time, turning it into “an Internet of Things (IoT) node on the World Wide Web.” Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk hopes to one day merge brains and and computers to give us the means to compete with AI.

There’s still the matter of how safe these brain-controlled interfaces will be, especially when it comes to driving, or whether the technology would be an improvement over wholly autonomous cars. Self-driving cars still have a long way to go before they’re the safest drivers on the road, yet we’ve seen multiple cases of humans being at fault when self-driving cars are involved in accidents. Perhaps Nissan’s demonstration next week,and other ongoing developments, will help us start to answer those questions.

 

https://futurism.com/nissans-brain-vehicle-interface-make-driving-safer-scanning-our-brains/

India’s 2030 deadline for electric vehicles

The era of the internal combustion engines (ICE) is coming to an end across the world. India, too, is gearing up for the change with road transport and highways minister Nitin Gadkari giving a deadline: 2030.

There are two big reasons for this – rising vehicular pollution and concerns around oil security. Today, 65-70% of the fuel produced by a barrel of crude oil is used for transportation. The US consumes 19 million barrels of oil each day; oil provides 92% of the energy that powers its cars, trucks, ships and aircraft. It is the same for India, the world’s third largest oil importer.

It now imports over 80% of its crude oil needs, up from 37% in 1990. In 2017-18, India’s oil import bill is likely to rise a third to touch $85-90 billion.

Many pull factors are at play, too. There are marked improvements in EV technology, including battery storage capacity, its cost economics, charging time and range anxiety. The cost of battery power has fallen from around $1,000 per kWh in 2010 to around $227 in 2016 and is expected to drop below $200 per kWh by 2020. By 2030 experts expect EVs to attain cost parity with ICE. 

China will lead the global EV wave — its manufacturers accounted for 43% of all EVs sold in 2016. In India, too, the government is making the first move. In Nagpur, the municipal corporation, Ola and Mahindra & Mahindra are experimenting with an all-EV fleet with charging infrastructure.

Meanwhile, the first tender of 10,000 EVs was won by Tata MotorsBSE -1.35 %. The EV push will have dramatic implications for India’s Motown. ICE-focused car companies and vendors will have to either reinvent or perish. On the other hand, a rash of established companies and startups, from M&M to Ather Energy and Chetan Maini-led Sun Mobility, will find new business opportunities.
WHY INDIA IS BETTING ON EV
Kill Fuel Bill: 
EV thrust and renewable energy like solar, with improved technology and viable pricing, will help India bring down its fuel import bill, which is expected to double from around $150 billion to $300 billion by 2030. 

It’s the New Flavour: World is caught in an EV wave with China, UK, France and others shunning ICE-based vehicles in favour of EVs Age of Disruption: A McKinsey study says 75% of global automotive experts think firms betting on new technologies — electrification, connected cars, autonomous driving and shared mobility — will disrupt Motown by 2030.

Pollution Worry: EVs have nil tailpipe emissions. A NITI Aayog report suggests that by betting on shared, connected and EV technologies, India could save 64% of energy demand for road transport and 37% of carbon emissions by 2030. 

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/auto/news/industry/why-india-will-push-further-down-the-e-vehicle-path-in-2018/articleshow/62310849.cms

Is there an autonomous vehicle bubble?

2017 saw autonomous technology accelerate and secure billions of dollars in funding. With the potential bonanza that self-driving cars are predicted to generate, some have pondered whether the self-driving feeding frenzy is yet another tech bubble ready to pop.

Given the insane amounts of money pouring into autonomous vehicle technology, I wouldn’t disagree that there’s some irrational exuberance surrounding self-driving cars. Based on key events this past year, that self-driving bubble just keeps getting bigger.

 From billion-dollar investments in artificial intelligence, to giant tech companies betting their future on self-driving’s potential, to the unleashing of robot-taxis on public roads, if anything 2017 indicated that autonomous technology is in its infancy. Here are the mileposts from the past year that prove this point.

As far as autonomous technology has come, it still can’t compete with experienced human drivers in complex situations such construction areas and bad weather. Decades behind the wheel builds an innate intelligence in most drivers that automakers and others must replicate before cars can become completely autonomous.

However, artificial intelligence can help accelerate the ability of autonomous vehicles to handle difficult real-world situations. That’s why automakers are heavily investing in AI. For example, in February Ford announced it would invest $1 billion over the next five years in the artificial intelligence startup Argo AI, founded by former Google and Uber self-driving experts.

At the end of 2015, Toyota also spent $1 billion to form the Toyota Research Institute with the stated goal “to use artificial intelligence to improve the quality of human life.” This year the Japanese automaker invested another $100 million to form Toyota AI Ventures to help fund AI startups “with a focus on autonomous mobility, robotics, data and cloud” technologies.

This is just the tip of the iceberg of autonomous technology investment. In October, the Brookings Institute estimated that a total $80 billion has already been invested in the space since 2013. This staggering sum is only “a precursor of things to come in fields like natural language processing, image recognition and others as these technologies gain commercial momentum.”

Intel is also betting big on autonomous cars and what it calls the “Passenger Economy,” which the chip giant says will be worth $7 trillion (with a T) by 2050. With this kind of cash up for grabs, Intel is forming partnerships with everyone from BMW to Warner Brothers Entertainment to get its chips into autonomous cars. Intel even acquired automotive camera maker Mobileye for $15 billion earlier this year.

Delphi, another old school tech supplier, albeit on the automotive side, is also all-in on autonomous cars. The company even spun out its profitable powertrain division earlier this year and changed its name to Aptiv to capitalize on the immense and potentially lucrative data that will be generated by autonomous cars.

Of course, fully self-driving cars will have to hit the road before the autonomous tech ecosystem can start paying dividends. That happened last month thanks to Alphabet’s self-driving car division, Waymo.

Waymo Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid minivan

Waymo launched its Early Rider Program in the Phoenix area in April by offering the public a chance to ride in its autonomous Chrysler Pacifica minivans. It then announced last month that the program would go completely driverless. Instead of the public, Waymo is using its own employees as guinea pigs to ride in the robot-driven Pacificas while they operate without a human behind the wheel.

On these fronts and others, including government regulation and reduced cost of sensors, autonomous driving technology picked up a lot of speed in 2017.

 Is it headed for a crash? Probably someday, at least from an investment standpoint.

After an overheated beginning, the Internet went through a similar bubble-bursting period about 15 years ago but eventually rebounded. And we all know how that turned out.

http://sea.pcmag.com/pcmag-sea/18870/news/the-self-driving-bubble-is-nowhere-near-bursting

China extends tax rebate for electric cars

BEIJING/SHANGHAI (Reuters) – China will extend a tax rebate on purchases of so-called new-energy vehicles (NEV) until the end of 2020, a boost for hybrid and electric car makers amid a shift by policy-makers away from the traditional internal combustion engine.

The finance ministry said in a statement on Wednesday the tax exemption, which was set to expire at the end of this year, will run from Jan. 1, 2018 until Dec. 31, 2020 for electric, plug-in petrol-electric hybrid and fuel-cell powered vehicles.

The extension comes as automakers in China brace to meet strict NEV quotas starting in 2019 that are sparking a flurry of electric car deals and new launches of electric and hybrid models.

Amid the shift, some global automakers have called on China to maintain financial support for the market, citing concerns consumer demand alone will not be sufficient to drive sales without state-backed incentive schemes to lure buyers.

The Ministry of Finance said the extension would help “increase support for innovation and development in new energy vehicles”, an area where China is hoping it can catch up – and even overtake – more established global automaker rivals.

Local firms like NEV specialist BYD Co Ltd are now jostling with global names such as Ford Motor Co and Nissan Motor Co Ltd in the race to develop successful “green” vehicles for the Chinese market.

China’s auto market, the world’s largest, has slowed sharply this year, but new-energy vehicles has been a bright spot. NEV sales in January-November jumped 51.4 percent and are on track to hit a target of 700,000 NEV sales this year.

Insurance for driverless cars

Robot cars are here, and now they come with insurance for humans. That’s thanks to a pre-Christmas deal reached between Waymo, Google’s self-driving technology spinoff, and Trov, an on-demand “insuretech” startup.

Trov will provide trip coverage for passengers of Waymo’s commercial ride-hailing service, to launch in Phoenix in early 2018. The trip insurance is underwritten by $45 million from Munich Re AG, and covers things like lost or damaged property, trip interruption, and medical expenses. Fees are included in the cost of the ride, so customers will not need to sign a separate agreement.

“This partnership highlights the convergence of the future of transportation with the future of insurance,” said Scott Walchek, founder and CEO of Trov. “We are genuinely excited to be partnering with Waymo in developing innovations for insuring people and property in the evolution of personal mobility.”

The agreement answers one of the lingering logistical questions about autonomous ride-hailing services: Who’s responsible when a driverless car gets into a fender bender…or worse? The answer is that passengers are to be covered by an “on-demand” insurance policy that allows for temporary coverage.

That’s a model that’s proving disruptive to giants in the insurance business. And it’s not just autonomous vehicles doing it: Tesla has spent the year bundling insurance with car sales in Asia, and automakers are beginning to offer vehicle subscription plansthat include insurance as a part of an all-inclusive monthly fee. It’s a trend that shows how changes to auto insurance will not be limited to ride-hailing services, but will soon go the way of mobility and customization.